QMR 10 | January 2014

How is the health and social care system performing?

  • “Despite warnings about a potential crisis in A&E, most hospitals are coping with winter pressures so far”

    John Appleby, Chief Economist
  • 1 in 5 More than 1 in 5 hospitals are set to be in deficit by the end of 2014/15

  • 1 in 8 1 in 8 CCG finance leads expect to be in deficit by the end of 2013/14

  • 47%
    Only 47 per cent of finance directors expect to meet their productivity targets for 2013/14
  • Staff morale now tops the list of concerns identified by NHS trust finance directors; CCG finance leads identified the A&E four-hour wait target as theirs

  • 1 in 4 Although the proportion of patients spending 4 or more hours in A&E is within target range, 1 in 4 hospitals breached this target during quarter 3 2013/14

Headlines

Download the QMR 10 January 2014 headlines PDF

Download PDF

How is the health and social care system performing?

  • Our latest survey of NHS trust finance directors, clinical commissioning group (CCG) finance leads, and directors of adult social services contains some good news, but also a worrying rise in pessimism.

  • Despite the ongoing financial squeeze, to date most NHS finance directors and directors of adult social services believe quality of care in the NHS has stayed stable or improved and indeed trusts are more confident about quality of care in December 2013 than they were a year previously. This suggests a service holding up well, which official data generally confirms. However, equally striking is the rapid growth in concern about staff morale and a wave of pessimism about delivering further savings and productivity gains in the future, as well as concern about the overall financial health of the wider health and social care system over the next year. If this growing pessimism proves correct, then the feasibility of achieving a balancing act between quality and finance may finally be coming to an end.

  • Optimistically, and especially given the problems with accident and emergency (A&E) waiting times experienced early last year, official data suggests that up to the end of December, A&E waiting times were generally within target. The number of health care-acquired infections has also remained at historically low levels.

  • More importantly perhaps, for those at the front line in hospitals, the four-hour A&E waiting time target is no longer trust finance directors’ main concern (see figure below). In our last three reports this target had topped the list of worries. Management focus, hard work by clinical and other staff, the media spotlight, a great deal of political pressure (plus relatively benign weather) has – so far – combined to ensure better performance this quarter.

  • As to whether the additional winter pressure monies have or will make a difference there were some mixed views. Nearly 30 per cent of NHS trust finance directors thought the impact of the extra money would be marginal. According to trust finance directors, improved care outside hospital in order to reduce preventable attendances at A&E, and reductions in delayed transfers elsewhere in their hospitals would make the most difference to pressures faced by A&E departments.

  • Past experience shows that the emergency care system will be under more pressure over January through to March. And, for CCG finance leads, the A&E target remains a top concern. It is also worth bearing in mind that while the target was met in aggregate in the quarter to December, slightly more than one in four trusts breached the target over this period.

NHS Trusts
Figure 1 Which aspects of your organisation’s performance are giving you most cause for concern at the moment? NHS trust finance directors
9 Health care-acquired infections
10 Cancer treatment waiting time targets
14 Emergency readmission threshold
14 Patients’ care experience
21 A&E four-hour wait target
21 Level of engagement in performance issues by senior clinicians
24 18-week RTT
29 Delayed transfers of care
31 Staff morale
  • More pessimistically, as this figure shows, for the first time the most important worry for trust finance directors is the morale of staff. As NHS England has recently noted, staff satisfaction is an important indicator of quality; as the latest planning framework for 2014/15 to 2018/19 states, ‘... happy, well-motivated staff deliver better care and … their patients have better outcomes’ (NHS England 2013a). The Point of Care Foundation has recently emphasised the importance of staff morale and patient care in: Staff care: how to engage staff in the NHS and why it matters (Point of Care Foundation 2014). While it is hard to see the pressure on staff from organisational and service change and general financial exigencies abating, addressing morale problems needs to be a priority.

  • Despite generally continuing good performance on the 18-week referral-to-treatment time (RTT) target, this continues to be a concern for trusts – perhaps reflecting that maintaining relatively good performance has not been easy and could become increasingly difficult.

  • On the question of financial pressures, evidence of a deteriorating position is clear: more than one in five trusts and one in eight CCGs report a possible overspend by the end of this financial year. The NHS Trust Development Authority has reported that around 30 per cent (of 102) non-foundation trusts are planning a deficit for this financial year (NHS Trust Development Authority 2013) and Monitor reports that around 11 per cent (of 147) foundation trusts are forecasting a similar position (Monitor 2013). Taken together the total proportion of provider organisations forecasting a deficit is around 19 per cent – very similar to the results of our survey.

  • Monitor’s second quarter performance report suggests some deterioration in foundation trusts’ financial position, with a number of organisations reporting deficits for the first time (Monitor 2013).

  • For directors of adult social services the position is even worse: a third forecast an overspend of more than 1 per cent of their budgets. This suggests that the tough financial settlement for local government is beginning to bite and reflect the mounting pressures on social care reported in the ADASS 2013 Budget Survey. The forecast end-of-year financial positions for CCGs and trusts are the worst since March 2011, when we began monitoring performance.

  • Trusts’ financial situation depends on achieving savings through their cost improvement programmes. As in previous quarters, trusts are aiming to make savings of around 4.8 per cent of turnover by the end of this financial year. How confident finance directors feel in achieving plans varies, and compared with previous surveys the proportion who are very or fairly concerned about their CIP plans now stands at more than 44 per cent – slightly higher than our last survey in July 2013 and the highest proportion recorded in our surveys to date (see figure below).

NHS Trusts
Figure 2 Trends: How confident are you of achieving your CIP target?

Note: QMR1 and QMR5 excluded as wording of responses not compatible with other quarters’ data.

  • Looking forward – in time, if not in anticipation – this quarter’s survey found finance directors more depressed than ever about the financial state of their local health and care economies. Eighty-six per cent of trust directors were fairly or very pessimistic about the next year financially, as were 65 per cent of CCG finance leads and 63 per cent of directors of adult social services. Nearly a third of trust finance directors say they are very pessimistic – the highest proportion since we began monitoring (see figure below).
NHS Trusts
Figure 3 Overall, what do you feel about the financial state of the wider health (and care) economy in your area over the next 12 months? NHS trust finance directors

Note: Question not asked before QMR3.

  • Beyond the next financial year and into 2015/16, the financial situation for the NHS looks even more difficult. While overall real allocations remain flat, the NHS will increase the amount of money to local authorities via the jointly managed Better Care Fund (formerly the Integration Transformation Fund) – bringing the total transfer to nearly £4 billion.

  • A summary from our own work and other research about which approaches are likely to achieve maximum impact for the Better Care Fund in a way that will benefit both the NHS and social care has recently been published by The King’s Fund (Bennett and Humphries 2014). However, NHS and local authority views on whether this fund will help or hinder work to maintain or indeed improve performance in areas such as the four-hour A&E target or delayed transfers are mixed. While many do not know what will happen, only 12 per cent of trust finance directors thought the Better Care Fund would be a help and nearly half thought it would be a hindrance. Views from directors of adult social services on the other hand were directly reversed, with 55 per cent saying the fund would help and only 9 per cent saying that it would be a hindrance.

  • It is hard not to feel the relevance today of Enver Hoxha’s New Year message to the Albanian people in 1967: ‘This year will be harder than last year. On the other hand, it will be easier than next year.’

  • More detailed results of the surveys and the performance dashboard results are set out in the next two sections of this report.

References

  • NHS England (2013a) Everyone counts: planning for patients 2014/15-2018/19. London: NHS England. Available at: www.england.nhs.uk (accessed on 13 January 2014).

  • Point of Care Foundation (2014). Staff care: how to engage staff in the NHS and why it matters. London: Point of Care Foundation. Available at: www.pointofcarefoundation.org (accessed on 17 January 2014).

  • NHS Trust Development Authority (2013). Summer report for the period 1 April to 31 July 2013. London: NHS TDA. Available at: www.ntda.nhs.uk (accessed on 13 January 2014).

  • Monitor (2013). NHS foundation trusts: review of six months to 30 September 2013. London: Monitor. Available at: www.monitor-nhsft.gov.uk (accessed on 13 January 2014).

  • Association of Directors of Adult Social Services (2013). 'ADASS budget survey 2013'. ADASS website. Available at: www.adass.org.uk (accessed on 14 January 2014).

  • Bennett L, Humphries R (2014). Making best use of the Better Care Fund: Spending to save? London: The King's Fund. Available at: www.kingsfund.org.uk (accessed on 13 January 2014).

1. Health and social care surveys

This QMR issue is based on an online survey of the following groups:

79 NHS trusts finance directors
58 clinical commissioning group (CCG) finance leads
47 adult social services directors

This report details the results of an online survey of NHS trust finance directors carried out between 22 November 2013 and 6 December 2013. We contacted 230 trust finance directors to take part and 79 responded 34 per cent response rate).

In addition, 195 clinical commissioning group (CCG) finance leads were contacted and 58 responded (30 per cent response rate). Between them these finance leads covered 72 CCGs.

The online survey of directors of adult social services was carried out over the same period. Of the 152 directors contacted, 47 responded (31 per cent response rate).

The panel were asked about the financial situation of their organisation and local health economies over the past financial year; the state of patient care in their area; the likely impact of the Better Care Fund (formerly the Integration Transformation Fund) on performance of key areas (such as the four-hour A&E standard and delayed transfers of care); and their assessment of the key current concerns for their organisation.

Given the level of interest and importance of winter pressures, we took the opportunity to ask trust finance directors about the likely impact of the additional winter funding and about changes required to reduce pressures on A&E departments.

2. End-of-year financial situation and cost improvement/quality, innovation, productivity and prevention programmes

Projected end-of-year financial balance (2013/14)

The NHS is more than two-and-a-half years through the most significant period of financial constraint in its history, with the prospects beyond 2015 looking even more challenging.

At the aggregate level, the NHS seems to be managing reasonably well, in large part due to continued pay restraint and reductions in the tariff. However, this masks growing pressures within the system, with 22 per cent of trusts now predicting a deficit in 2013/14. This is the highest since we began reporting on the financial state of the NHS in 2011.

NHS Trusts
Figure 1: What is your organisation’s likely end-of-year (2013/14) financial situation?
45 In surplus
17 Break even (+/-0.25% of turnover)
17 In deficit

Note: The area of the bubble in the survey charts represents the value shown. The sizes of the bubbles are comparable between the charts.

CCG Leads
Figure 2: What is your organisation’s likely end-of-year (2013/14) financial situation?
57 In surplus
6 Break even (+/-0.25% of turnover)
9 In deficit

Note: 58 CCG finance leads answered this question for the 72 CCGs they cover collectively.

NHS Trusts
Figure 4: Trends: What is your organisation’s likely end-of-year financial situation?

Cost improvement programmes

2012/13 was the second full year of the four-year £20 billion productivity challenge. Now, part way into the third year of the productivity challenge, how are NHS organisations faring?

The average cost improvement programme (CIP) target for trusts this financial year is again 4.8 per cent, representing between 3 per cent and 7.5 per cent of turnover.

Since the beginning of this financial year there has been a reduction in uncertainty regarding the achievement of planned CIPs expressed by trust finance directors and now around 45 per cent are very or fairly confident of achieving their plans.

NHS Trusts
Figure 5: What is your organisation’s CIP target for this financial year (2013/14) as a percentage of turnover/allocation?
CCG Leads
Figure 6: What is your organisation’s QIPP target for this financial year (2013/14) as a percentage of turnover/allocation?

Note: 58 CCG finance leads answered this question for the 72 CCGs they cover collectively.

However, a similar proportion (45 per cent) are either fairly or very concerned about the achievement of their organisation’s CIP plans – the largest proportion since the summer of 2011 (figure 7 and figure 9).

CCG finance leads are slightly more optimistic about achieving their Quality, Innovation, Productivity and Prevention (QIPP) plans, with more than 61 per cent fairly or very confident (figure 8).

NHS Trusts
Figure 7: How confident are you of achieving your CIP target in 2013/14?
9 Very confident
28 Fairly confident
7 Uncertain
18 Fairly concerned
17 Very concerned
CCG Leads
Figure 8: How confident are you of achieving your QIPP target in 2013/14?
15 Very confident
29 Fairly confident
6 Uncertain
7 Fairly concerned
15 Very concerned

Note: 58 CCG finance leads answered this question for the 72 CCGs they cover collectively

NHS Trusts
Figure 2 Trends: How confident are you of achieving your CIP target?

Note: QMR1 and QMR5 excluded as wording of responses not compatible with other quarters’ data.

The £20 billion productivity challenge

Our previous reports show that NHS organisations appear to have made good progress in meeting productivity targets during the first two years of the Nicholson Challenge (Appleby et al 2013, 2012).

However, as we approach 2014/15, just under two-thirds of trust finance directors rated the risk of failure to meet the challenge as high or very high (figure 10).

CCG finance leads were again slightly more optimistic, but still six out of ten thought there was a high or very high risk of failure (figure 11).

NHS Trusts
Figure 10: The NHS is now halfway through the so-called Nicholson Challenge. What is your estimate of the risk involved in achieving productivity gains of the value of £20 billion by 2014/15?
1 Very little risk of failure
5 Little risk of failure
22 50/50 risk of failure or success
24 High risk of failure
27 Very high risk of failure
CCG Leads
Figure 11: The NHS is now halfway through the so-called Nicholson Challenge. What is your estimate of the risk involved in achieving productivity gains of the value of £20 billion by 2014/15?
0 Very little risk of failure
3 Little risk of failure
20 50/50 risk of failure or success
29 High risk of failure
6 Very high risk of failure
NHS Trusts
Figure 12: Trends: The NHS is now halfway through the so-called Nicholson Challenge. What is your estimate of the risk involved in achieving productivity gains of the value of £20 billion by 2014/15?

Note: Question not asked before QMR6 or in QMR7.

3. The state of patient care

The driving ambition underlying the challenge to deliver greater productivity and a stable financial position is not only to maintain the quality of services to patients, but to improve it. This emphasis on improving quality of care was underlined in three high-profile reports in 2013 (Francis 2013, Berwick 2013, Keogh 2013).

When asked about the state of patient care in the past 12 months, the majority of respondents felt that patient care had stayed the same (figures 13,14 and 15).

Nevertheless, around one in five trust finance directors and CCG finance leads felt care in their local area had got worse over the past year – an improvement on previous survey results, but of concern nonetheless (figure 16).

NHS Trusts
Figure 13: Thinking about the NHS in your local area, in the past 12 months, do you think it has got better, worse, or stayed the same in terms of patient care?
20 Better
41 The same
18 Worse
CCG Leads
Figure 14: Thinking about the NHS in your local area, in the past 12 months, do you think it has got better, worse, or stayed the same in terms of patient care?
18 Better
29 The same
11 Worse
NHS Trusts
Figure 16: Trends: Thinking about the NHS in your local area, in the past 12 months, do you think it has got better, worse, or stayed the same in terms of patient care?

Note: Question not asked before QMR6.

4. Organisational challenges

The scale of the current system reform, overlaid on an unprecedentedly tough financial settlement and the associated and equally unprecedented productivity target, continue to present a challenging environment for NHS organisations. This is exacerbated by a tough financial settlement for local government and evidence that local authority spending on adult social care continues to fall.

To understand how this was affecting them, trust finance directors and CCG finance leads were asked to state the three aspects of their organisation’s (or organisations they contract with) performance that were giving them most concern at the moment.

CCG finance leads continue to be concerned about A&E four-hour wait targets, while the level of staff morale is the top concern for trust finance directors. This is the first time since we began asking this question that levels of staff morale has been listed as a top concern (figures 17 and 18).

NHS Trusts
Figure 1 Which aspects of your organisation’s performance are giving you most cause for concern at the moment? NHS trust finance directors
9 Health care-acquired infections
10 Cancer treatment waiting time targets
14 Emergency readmission threshold
14 Patients’ care experience
21 A&E four-hour wait target
21 Level of engagement in performance issues by senior clinicians
24 18-week RTT
29 Delayed transfers of care
31 Staff morale
CCG Leads
Figure 18: Which aspects of your organisation’s performance are giving you most cause for concern at the moment? Please select top three
9 Staff morale
10 Level of engagement in performance issues by senior clinicians
11 Emergency readmission threshold
11 Patients’ care experience
15 Delayed transfers of care
16 Cancer treatment waiting time targets
20 Health care-acquired infections
28 18-week RTT
40 A&E four-hour wait target

5. Winter pressures on A&E departments

Analysis of data for the final quarter of 2012/13 showed that nearly 6 per cent of patients waited four hours or longer in A&E departments, the highest level since 2004.

Since then, there has been sustained pressure on the system to prepare and plan for winter 2013/14. Part of the planning was the distribution of £250 million to help A&E departments prepare for winter 2013/14, announced in June 2013 (Prime Minister’s Office 2013), and a further £150 million announced in November 2013 (NHS England 2013b).

Only 13 per cent of respondents felt this additional funding would have a significant impact on the pressures their organisations were likely to face over the winter months (figure 19).

As for the top three actions that would help with pressures on A&E departments, finance directors noted improvements in care outside hospital to reduce preventable admissions to A&E, reductions in delayed transfers of care elsewhere in the hospital to help with patient flow out of emergency departments and front-door triaging by senior doctors to direct patients to the most appropriate care for their condition (figure 20).

NHS Trusts
Figure 19: If you have received, or plan to apply for, any additional winter pressure funding, what impact will this have on the pressures your organisation is facing this winter?
8 Significant impact
35 Some impact
18 Marginal impact

Note: Question only applicable to those organisations that applied for additional funding (61).

NHS Trusts
Figure 20: Which of the following would have the most impact in reducing the pressures on your A&E department?
6 More beds and associated resources in other parts of the hospital
12 More senior clinical staff available in A&E
16 Front-door triaging by senior hospital clinicians/GPs
25 Reduction in delayed transfers of care elsewhere in the hospital
30 Improved out-of-hospital care to reduce preventable attendances

Note: Respondents asked to choose top two actions.

6. The Better Care Fund

Preventing unnecessary use of A&E services and ensuring delays in discharge from hospital are minimised will, of course, be two priorities for the Better Care Fund, which will be established mainly from top-sliced NHS funding in 2015/16 and administered jointly by the NHS and local authorities.

When asked if the Better Care Fund is likely help or hinder work to maintain performance in key priority areas such as delayed transfers of care, slightly more than half of directors of adult social services thought it would, but more than a third did not know (figure 23), perhaps reflecting that discussions about the fund were at an early stage.

CCGs’ views about the Better Care Fund were more mixed – 38 per cent thought it would help (figure 22), and trust finance directors were the least optimistic with only 12 per cent saying it would help (figure 21).

NHS Trusts
Figure 21: On balance, do you think the Integration Transformation Fund, will help or hinder your work maintaining/improving performance in key areas such as the four-hour A&E target and delayed transfers of care?
10 Help
32 Don’t know
37 Hinder
CCG Leads
Figure 22: On balance, do you think the Integration Transformation Fund, will help or hinder your work maintaining/improving performance in key areas such as the four-hour A&E target and delayed transfers of care?
22 Help
16 Don’t know
20 Hinder

7. The financial state of local health and care economies over the next 12 months

When asked how they felt about the financial state of their local health and care economy – not just their own organisations – over the next 12 months, nearly 9 out of 10 trust finance directors were fairly or very pessimistic. These are the most pessimistic views of the future since we began our surveys (figures 24 and 27).

Around two-thirds of CCG finance leads and directors of adult social services were also very or fairly pessimistic about the future financial state of their local health economies (figures 25 and 26).

NHS Trusts
Figure 24: Overall, what do you feel about the financial state of the wider health (and care) economy in your area over the next 12 months?
0 Very optimistic
2 Fairly optimistic
9 Neutral
42 Fairly pessimistic
26 Very pessimistic
CCG Leads
Figure 25: Overall, what do you feel about the financial state of the wider health (and care) economy in your area over the next 12 months?
0 Very optimistic
10 Fairly optimistic
10 Neutral
25 Fairly pessimistic
13 Very pessimistic
NHS Trusts
Figure 3 Overall, what do you feel about the financial state of the wider health (and care) economy in your area over the next 12 months? NHS trust finance directors

Note: Question not asked before QMR3.

8. References

  • Appleby J, Thompson J, Humphries R, Jabbal J, Galea A (2013). Quarterly monitoring report, September 2013. London: The King’s Fund. Available at: www.kingsfund.org.uk (accessed on 13 January 2014).

  • Appleby J, Thompson J, Humphries R, Jabbal J, Galea A (2012). Quarterly monitoring report, September 2012. London: The King’s Fund. Available at: www.kingsfund.org.uk (accessed on 13 January 2014).

  • Prime Minister’s Office (2013). ‘Prime Minister announces £500 million to relieve pressures on A&E’. London: 10 Downing Street/Department of Health. Available at: www.gov.uk (accessed on 13 January 2014).

  • NHS England (2013b). 'Extra £150 million to ease winter pressures'. News article. NHS England website. Available at: www.england.nhs.uk (accessed on 13 January 2014).

  • Berwick D (2013). A promise to learn – a commitment to act: improving the safety of patients in England. London: The Stationery Office. Available at: www.gov.uk (accessed on 14 January 2014).

  • Francis R (2013). Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry. Chaired by Robert Francis QC. London: The Stationery Office. Available at: www.midstaffspublicinquiry.com (accessed 14 January 2014).

  • Keogh B (2013). Review into the quality of care and treatment provided by 14 hospital trusts in England: overview report. London: NHS England. Available at: www.nhs.uk (accessed on 14 January 2014).

1. Health care-acquired infections

C difficile and MRSA

The recent downward trend in reported cases of C difficile continued in the latest figures for November 2013. The 420 cases reported in that month were 15 per cent fewer than at the same time last year and around 1 per cent down on the previous month (figure 28).

Though monthly counts of MRSA in November 2013 were 29 per cent higher than the previous month and more than 8 per cent higher than a year ago, absolute numbers remain small – 40 in November 2013 – and month-on-month variations unpredictable (figure 29).

Figure 28: Monthly counts of C difficile
Figure 29: Monthly counts of MRSA

Note: It is not known what impact the change in recording MRSA cases has had on the comparability of data pre- and post-April 2013

Data source: Post-infection review assigned monthly counts of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteraemia

2. Workforce

Redundancies and staff numbers

Redundancies for clinical and non-clinical posts fell in quarter 1 2013/14: there were a total of 1,612 compulsory and voluntary redundancies compared to more than 3,200 in the previous quarter (figure 30).

The total number of hospital and community health services staff rose in September 2013 by 7,540. The large reductions in management staff since March 2010 have been slightly reversed over the six months since the beginning of the financial year (figure 31).

Figure 30: Compulsory and voluntary clinical and non-clinical redundancies
Figure 31: Index change in NHS full-time equivalent staff: September 2009 – September 2013

Note: Most recent dip in figures for April 2013 due to usual seasonal variation in voluntary and compulsory redundancies (though these increased in 2013), in addition to an increase in the number of fixed-term contracts finishing with the advent of the new NHS environment and a continued policy to reduce management layers following the White Paper: Liberating the NHS (Department of Health 2010).

Data source: Monthly NHS Hospital and Community Health Service (HCHS) Workforce Statistics in England – September 2013, Provisional statistics

3. Waiting times

Inpatients, outpatients and diagnostics

Median waits in November 2013 reduced for inpatients and diagnostics, remained the same for outpatients and increased for those still on waiting lists. These changes are in line with previous seasonal patterns (figure 32).

In November 2013 the proportion of patients waiting longer than 18 weeks for treatment (6 weeks for diagnostics) were up for all waiting lists. This broadly follows seasonal variations for this month. However, the percentage waiting longer than 18 weeks for outpatient treatment is now at its highest since October 2008. The adjusted inpatient wait (the target measure) is at its highest level since November 2011.

Figure 32: Waiting times: Median wait (weeks)
Figure 33: Waiting times: Percentage still waiting/having waited more than 18 weeks (more than 6 weeks for diagnostics)

Accident and emergency

In quarter 3 2013/14 the proportion of patients waiting longer than four hours from arrival to admission, transfer or discharge increased to 4.4 per cent. This is an increase on the quarter 1 and 2 figures from this year, but performance against the 95 per cent target has been maintained (figure 34).

The weekly A&E has been highly variable, though only 2 out of the previous 13 weeks that make up quarter 3 breached the 95 per cent target. The latest data point, one week (5 January 2014) after the end of quarter 3 is above the 95 per cent threshold however, at 5.7 per cent (figure 35).

More than a quarter (26 per cent) of hospitals breached the four-hour standard in quarter 3 of 2013/14. This is an increase on both the previous quarters in 2013/14 and the highest proportion seen in quarter 3 over the past three years (figure 36).

Figure 34: Waiting times: Percentage waiting more than four hours in A&E from arrival to admission, transfer or discharge
Figure 35: Percentage waiting more than four hours in A&E from arrival to admission, transfer or discharge. Weekly data: November 2010 – January 2014
Figure 36: Percentage of providers reporting more than 5 per cent of patients waiting longer than four hours in A&E departments from arrival to admission, transfer or discharge

‘Trolley waits’ (those patients delayed for more than four hours in type 1 (major) A&E departments from decision to admit to admission) were up to 4.2 per cent in the latest quarter. This is 0.7 percentage points higher than the previous quarter but down on quarter one, and similar to figures at the same time last year (figure 37).

Weekly data shows high variation in the figures for trolley waits, with some identifiable seasonal variation. From August through to December 2013 there has been an increase in the proportion of patients experiencing long trolley waits, which is a similar pattern to recent years (figure 38).

Figure 37: ‘Trolley waits’: The proportion of patients spending more than four hours in major A&E departments from decision to admit to admission into hospital
Figure 38: ‘Trolley waits’: The proportion of patients spending more than four hours in major A&E departments from decision to admit to admission into hospital. Weekly data: November 2010 to January 2014

4. Delayed transfers of care

The average number of patients delayed per day was up in November 2013 compared to the previous month and to the same month last year. This is roughly in line with previous seasonal trends, though the long-term trend remains relatively flat (figure 39).

Comparing the total number of days delayed with the average daily number of patients delayed shows that both metrics follow a similar pattern. The number of days delayed shows high monthly variation but has remained relatively stable over the past four years (figure 40).

Closer analysis of the sources of delays suggests that reasons attributable to the NHS have risen from around 60 per cent in 2010/11 to 70 per cent in 2013/14 while those attributable to social services have fallen from 35 per cent to 25 per cent of total delayed days.

Figure 39: Delayed transfers of care: Monthly counts of patients
Figure 40: Delayed transfers of care: Patients and days delayed

5. References

  • Department of Health (2010). Equity and Excellence: Liberating the NHS. London: Department of Health: Available at: www.dh.gov.uk (accessed on 21 January 2014).

About the QMR

What is The King’s Fund’s quarterly monitoring report?

Our quarterly monitoring report (QMR) reveals the views of NHS trust finance directors and clinical commissioning group finance leads on the productivity challenges they face, and examines some key performance data for the NHS in England.

It provides a regular update on how the NHS is coping as it grapples with the evolving reform agenda and the more significant challenge of making radical improvements in productivity.

What is different about the digital QMR?

Our first nine issues were produced as longer PDF documents and can be found on The King’s Fund website at kingsfund.org.uk/qmrproject. The new QMR features digital versions of the survey results and interactive performance data charts showing the key findings for this quarter.

Where does the data come from?

The quarterly monitoring report combines publicly available data on selected NHS performance measures with views from NHS trust finance directors and clinical commissioning group finance leads. These views are collated through a survey run by The King’s Fund data team.

Making the most of the digital QMR

  • Filtering the survey by respondents

    Filter the survey results by respondent group (financial directors of NHS trusts, financial directors of clinical commissioning groups, and financial directors in social care in applicable quarters) by clicking them on or off at the top of the survey page.

  • Comments from survey respondents

    Read selected comments from the survey respondents by clicking on the speech bubble

  • Survey charts

    The area of the bubble in the survey charts represents the value shown. The sizes of the bubbles are comparable between the charts.

  • Sharing and saving charts

    Share charts on social media sites by clicking on the share logo
    You can also download the charts as images by clicking on the save logo

  • Changing the date range of the NHS performance data charts

    See the data in a different date range by moving the sliders on the x-axis.

  • Printing the QMR

    Print the report by clicking on the print icon